This case is about mobility clauses – and the implied terms that limit their application. It’s a neat illustration of an employer thinking that because the contract says they can do something, they don’t have to worry about how they go about doing it!
Cases referred to:
United Bank Ltd v Akhtar  IRLR 507
Woods v WM Car Services (Peterborough) Ltd  IRLR 347
To see the other sorts of things I do go to darrennewman.org
For the Range of Reasonable Responses Newsletter subscribe here