16. United Bank Ltd v Akhtar

This case is about mobility clauses  – and the implied terms that limit their application. It’s a neat illustration of an employer thinking that because the contract says they can do something, they don’t have to worry about how they go about doing it!

Cases referred to:

United Bank Ltd v Akhtar [1989] IRLR 507

Woods v WM Car Services (Peterborough) Ltd [1981] IRLR 347

You can subscribe to this podcast on iTunes 

To see the other sorts of things I do go to darrennewman.org

For the Range of Reasonable Responses Newsletter subscribe here 

About Darren Newman

Employment law consultant, trainer, writer and anorak
This entry was posted in Podcasts and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s