21. Linfood Cash and Carry v Thomson

This week’s episode looks at Linfood Cash and Carry v Thomson & anor. This case from 1989 gives guidance to employers relying on anonymous evidence in disciplinary cases. To see how that guidance is used in practice we also consider dark deeds in crisp factory with Ramsey & ors v Walkers Snack Foods.

To see more of what I do visit my website at darrennewman.org or sign up to the Range of Reasonable Responses Newsletter.

 

Posted in Podcasts | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

20. RSPB v Croucher

This episode features RSPB v Croucher a case about the scope of the duty to investigate when the employee has already admitted their guilt. We also look at the more recent case of CRO Ports v Wiltshire which shows how Croucher applies today.

To find out more about what I do – including training on conducting fair investigations – visit my website darrennewman.org

For monthly updates on the world of employment law subscribe to the Range of Reasonable Responses Newsletter here

Posted in Podcasts | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

19. Archibald v Fife Council

In this episode I look at the 2004 House of Lords decision in Archibald v Fife Council. This is one of the leading cases on the duty to make reasonable adjustments and shows just how wide that duty can be.

To learn more about what I do visit my website: darrennewman.org or subscribe to the Range of Reasonable Responses Newsletter

Posted in Podcasts | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

18. Webb v Emo Air Cargo Ltd

Webb v Emo Air Cargo Ltd is the story of how pregnancy discrimination became established as a claim in its own right. Along the way we take in:

Turley v Allders Department Stores Ltd [1980] ICR 6

Hayes v Malleable Working Men’s Club and Institute [1985] ICR 703

Dekker v Stichting Vormingscentrum voor Jonge Volwassenen (VJV-Centrum) Plus,  Case C-177/88

and

Tele Danmark v HK (acting on behalf of Brandt-Nielsen), Case C-109/00

 

Posted in Podcasts | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

17. Addis v Gramophone Co Ltd

We’re going seriously deep into the archives for this one with the 1909 decision in Addis v Gramophone Company Ltd. In this case the House of Lords looked at the compensation due to an employee who was dismissed without notice or explanation, causing potentially serious damage to his reputation. The decision has been controversial ever since and continues to be debated.

Also referred to are the House of Lords decisions in Malik v BCCI and Johnson v Unisys.

We end with a sing-song!

Don’t forget that you can subscribe to this podcast on iTunes

To see the other sorts of things I do go to darrennewman.org

For the Range of Reasonable Responses Newsletter subscribe here

 

Posted in Podcasts, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

16. United Bank Ltd v Akhtar

This case is about mobility clauses  – and the implied terms that limit their application. It’s a neat illustration of an employer thinking that because the contract says they can do something, they don’t have to worry about how they go about doing it!

Cases referred to:

United Bank Ltd v Akhtar [1989] IRLR 507

Woods v WM Car Services (Peterborough) Ltd [1981] IRLR 347

You can subscribe to this podcast on iTunes 

To see the other sorts of things I do go to darrennewman.org

For the Range of Reasonable Responses Newsletter subscribe here 

Posted in Podcasts | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

15. W Brooks & Son v Skinner

In a special yuletide edition we talk about W Brooks & Son v Skinner [1984] IRLR 379. It’s not exactly a classic – but it is about dismissing someone who got drunk at a Christmas party – and in December we all know that employment law is mainly about Christmas parties.

holly

Actually this is quite a nice case that has something to say about zero tolerance policies – which links in to the very recent case of Arnold Clark Automobiles Ltd v Spoor– so it’s not just gratuitous attempt to link employment law to Christmas.

But it is partly that.

Happy Christmas everyone.

 

 

Posted in Podcasts | 1 Comment